Skip to main content

On my dear readers who can't really be only my friends but maybe could be new friends one day



Looking at the Google Analytics report for this blog has given some interesting facts about which city the readers are living in, how long you are staying around, whether you are a new or returning visitor. So although I don’t know any of you by name, hopefully you will recognize yourself in the following, providing you’re reading this blog again:

Thank you to the person/s from New York who spent an average of 55 seconds reading a couple of pages.

Thank you to the person/s in Christchurch, New Zealand (is that you, Mark?) who read an average of 1.57 pages and spent 90 seconds doing so.

Thank you to the person/s in Addison who read an average of 2 pages per visit and spent 5 minutes on the site.

A big thank you to the persons in Portland (Oregon or Maine?) and Glasgow, Scotland, who spent 32 minutes reading an average of 6 pages. Please come again.

Thank you to the person/s in Seattle who visited several times, and spent more than 10 minutes reading an average of 5 pages. Despite the rain, Seattle is one of the best places I’ve visited in the USA.

Thank you to the people from Edinburgh, Oakland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Tucson (again, fantastic place), Sydney, St Paul, Toronto, and Albuquerque (hi, Johnny) who visited more than once and stuck around for up to 11 minutes at a time.

To anyone who recognizes themselves in this list, and to all who are reading this now, thanks for looking at this recently-started blog. And if you take the time to leave a comment after you’ve read a post, I would love to start a conversation with you.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader

Comments

  1. No love for Techny? We're used to it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Philip...now the pressha is on to stay longer and read more:>

    Seriously, thesis gets handed in Monday and am looking forward to reading more of your blogs as they're just so damn interesting!!!

    Thanks for taking the time and effort to share such great stuff!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was wondering where Techny was, but assumed it was a made up internet site or summink.

    So to make up for it:

    "HERE'S A BIG SHOUT OUT TO TECHNY, YO!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dearest Robyn,

    Thank you for the comment and the praise. Very best of luck with the thesis.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post

Crikey!

It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader