Skip to main content

On surprises in the studio

My work in the studio this year has mainly involved working and reworking 'damaged' photos, then making litho-transfers of them and working on them again, and repeating the process continually until the image starts to break down and become more mysterious. Or I've been adapting that process for the public art project. I always find myself pulled back to painting, though, despite the fact that I never seem to produce anything that I'm satisfied with. I often do a kind of monoprinting on the surface of the board or canvas, where I place large sheets of newsprint onto the wet surface, and lift them off to drag some of the pigments off and to add new textures. While most of the paintings I've worked on this year are still nowhere near finished or satisfactory, I decided to pull out all these sheets of newsprint, just to see if they would give me some inspiration. Sure enough, these pieces of paper that I had nearly thrown away were in fact better than the paintings that I was dabbing them with. Here are four:
Click the image to considerably embiggen it
When I was last in the studio, I put some of these out and went back to one of the paintings. Here is a bad cell phone photo (the canvas isn't really bowed), but it gives some idea of what the newsprint blottings might lead to:

Patty often mentions this in relation to her creative writing students: often the work they think is just the throw-away stuff is really their best material. She also tells me that when I show her something from the studio, she doesn't say any more whether she likes it, because she knows it will be completely changed by the next time she sees it.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post

Crikey!

It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader