Skip to main content

Six of the Best, Part 2

Part 2 of an interview series in which I invite artists to respond to six questions about art, process, and creativity. Today's artist is Paul Baines, whose spectacular work caught my eye on Google Plus.

"Garbage Man", 2012
Philip Hartigan: What medium/media do you chiefly use, and why?

Paul Baines: I usually sketch in ink and then colorise digitally. I do paint but at a snail's pace. Print gives me the speed and scale I need. I am currently and very slowly working on a large scale painting, and even a novel, all long term plans.

PH: What piece are you currently working on?

PB: "White Castle" - I don't want to give it away, but it's definitely British art.

PH: What creative surprises are happening in the current work?

PB: I've realised I live in a "police kingdom" as a opposed to a "police state". I've always resented the idea of being a subject of anyone, dear old bleedin' monarchy or otherwise, but with the increasing surveillance culture, ACTA, and more CCTV than anywhere else in the world (including dictatorships), I'm starting to wonder is Britain the least democratic democracy in the world?

"Day of the Dud," 2009

PH: What other artistic medium (or non-artistic activity) feeds your creative process?

PB: A combination of fear and dreams. I've a wild imagination, ideas run around my head all day, some creative, some political, some metaphysical. Sleep seems to be where I make most sense of what I've learned each day. Art is the proof that it happened.

PH: What's the first ever piece of art you remember making?

PB: A paper mâché lighthouse complete with flashing light. In fact my mum made most of it.

I didn't discover art until much later. I've always been creative, but pinning it down as a particular skill has taken a couple of decades. I spent a year on a music production course, I've been a graphic designer in the past too, but that was depressing. Right now I'm writing a novel (which will probably take years). I've even had interest for a screenplay I worked on over a decade ago. Unfortunately the execs didn't like the title, "Milkman". And no, it's not about milk. I think I chucked it on a fire a couple of years later and threw all my energy into building up some decent art skills so I could communicate with a wider circle of like-minded people. If I had the dosh, I'd make films --  I spent a couple of years studying film at Brighton. All I know is that art has purpose again. For a while, it was just for the rich, but street art changed all that. Now every medium is open to the general public. Corporate media is dying a slow and painful death.

"Born Again," 2010

PH: Finally, and you can answer this in any way that's meaningful to you: why are you an artist?

PB: I don't know, just lucky I guess.

If you liked this interview, and you'd like to keep up to date with the series, why not Subscribe, or sign-up via Google Connect, using one of the options over on the right? Thanks, and keep creating.


Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader