Skip to main content

On the community memoir/public art project

So on Saturday, Patty and I did the first of two introductory presentations for the community memoir/public art project for Carroll County, Illinois. We're holding a second one on Monday evening, and the plan is to get as many people from the county as possible to see what the project is about, and then sign up for a writing workshop starting next week. 

The project is called 'Illuminating the Past, Lighting the Present'. The title originates in the pieces I was doing last year based on damaged photos printed on luminaries. For the Carroll County Historical Society, we are asking participants to bring along some photos showing themselves and at least one other family member. Through the writing workshops, Patty will get the participants to generate short moments of memoir - what they call 'remembered instances' at Columbia College. I will then print 'damaged photo' versions of the pictures, together with the text, similar to the following:

A collage of photos + text will then be printed onto light panels, hopefully creating an effect like a giant luminary. This piece will be installed outside the Owen Philips Miles museum in Mount Carroll, which is a beautiful 1873 italianate building that is the home of the Carroll County Historical Society. It will be unveiled in October, and there will be a reading from the participants' memoir material at the museum. I will also create a handmade project book to archive the project. There is also a Facebook Fan Page for the project, which is shown in the right hand column of this blog.

Now that the project has kicked off in earnest, I will be posting regularly as we go through each stage of our timeline.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader


Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader