Skip to main content

6 reasons artists should use social media

When I started this blog, twenty months and 760 posts ago, I didn’t imagine that it would take so much of my time, nor that it would drag me even further into using other social media, such as Twitter. Nearly 100 people have subscribed to this blog in one way or another, so by definition if you are reading this, you are using social media even if this is the only thing you do.
Perhaps you use Facebook, and nothing else. Perhaps you use Facebook and Twitter, and you’ve decided that anything else would be too much. Perhaps you read and send messages via these things, but wish you didn’t, and you plan to go ahead with that thing you’ve wanted to do for a long time: stop using them altogether.
If you’re an artist, you’ve probably said: This is really wasting my time, and I need to get back to my studio.
If you’ve had any of these thoughts, you might roll your eyes at what I’m going to say next. Not only are there very good reasons why you should use social media – there are good reasons why you should use more of them.
1. It’s true that most of the people you ‘meet’ online will never turn into physical friends. But every person you’re in contact with is a potential pair of eyes for your work.
2. If you add comments to blog posts, or Facebook threads, or Google plus posts, or you retweet a Tweet, you’re leaving your signature somewhere on the internet, and you’re spreading your name around. So the more media you use, the wider you cast your net.
3. Online conversations can lead to real-world results. I’ve been using Google Plus for months now, and it has led to contacts with several very successful artists, some of whom allowed me to interview them; and lately it led in part to my being asked to blog for an art website.
4. You are building up a potential mailing list for your next show or event.
5. If you engage in a discussion and leave a comment, or if you write something longer, perhaps on your own blog, you are thinking at length about things that matter to you (art and the world it connects to) and you are writing about your own work. Any time that you write about yourself, you are reflecting on your own process, always a valuable thing for a visually-oriented person.
6. You don’t have to spend hours and hours every day looking at the torrent of information on Facebook or Google Plus (although believe me, you can!). I find that if I’m disciplined, I can do everything I need to in about an hour. That’s one hour a day on self-marketing and promotion – and it’s never wasted time.
My personal preference at the moment is for Google Plus – and in a future post I'll talk about why it's a much better platform than Facebook for artists.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader


  1. Appreciate your thoughts on this thing of social media.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader