"New City", the Chicago newspaper, has a decent review of "The Lucerne Project". It's somewhat more rebarbative than the article in "The Columbia Chronicle", and the reviewer slightly misunderstood the piece of writing that he refers to. But it's under the heading "RECOMMENDED", and he describes the prints in an interesting way.
"New City", the Chicago newspaper, has a decent review of "The Lucerne Project". It's somewhat more rebarbative than the article in "The Columbia Chronicle", and the reviewer slightly misunderstood the piece of writing that he refers to. But it's under the heading "RECOMMENDED", and he describes the prints in an interesting way.