Skip to main content

6 reasons why artists should use Google Plus

Google Plus is Google’s recently launched excursion into the world of social media. A question that comes up a lot is: All my friends and family are on Facebook, why should I join up for something where I don’t know anybody? This leads straight to the first reason:
1. That’s exactly what Google Plus is for: making contact and starting conversations with people in your own field who you don’t know. It seems counter-intuitive, but the fact is I’ve encountered more artists, like-minded people, and people willing to comment and engage on Google Plus than I ever thought possible.
2. The search functions within Google Plus are improving all the time, and they make it possible to find other artists, and different types of artists, very quickly. You add them to your Circles, and within hours you can have a vastly expanded audience for yourself and your art.
3. The photo viewer within Google Plus is hugely superior to Facebook’s. Google is also much less cavalier about ‘owning’ and reusing all your material, if this is something that bothers you.
4. Even though the number of people joining G+ is growing exponentially, it still feels new, and like being in at the start of something exciting. People like Samantha Villenave are curating artists they like – a simple idea, but she’s been smart enough to do it first, and she’s doing herself and everyone else a service by promoting the cause of artists.
5. The concept of ‘Circling’ someone on G+ is like ‘Following’ on Twitter, but there’s no limit to the length of what you can post on G+, which means that people who Circle you get to read more than 140 characters at a time.
6.  Also, as a general point of usage, the interface is cleaner than Facebook, less cluttered with ads and that horrible FB timeline. There’s also (so far) less of the  minute-by-minute triviality that makes FB sometimes feel like a toy for watching your limited time on earth circle down the drain of oblivion.
Are you an artist who is using G+? Have you noticed any other reasons why it’s a good place for artists?

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader


Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader