Skip to main content

Interview with 365 Jars Project artist Kirsty Hall

Jar 96: paper, pencil, nettle yarn.
Yesterday I published a blog post about Kirsty Hall and her 365 Jars project, a fascinating idea in which this UK artist is 'releasing into the wild' a glass jar containing a small piece of art every day for a year.  I asked Kirsty for an interview on the project and her other art, and her answers provide more insight into a most unusual participatory public art project.  

Philip: What made you want to start this project?

Kirsty: It’s really a cunningly disguised exercise regime. I wanted to walk every day and knew that the only way I’d do it was to incorporate it into an art piece.

There were other motivations too. Towards the end of last year I was working very hard on my consulting business and started to feel that my art was being pushed to one side. I wanted to replace art in the centre of my life and achieve a better balance. Of course now I don’t have enough time for the consulting business!

Philip: How much work does it require each day?

Kirsty: It’s usually at least two hours of work every single day and I frequently have whole days when I do nothing but the jar project. Basically it never leaves me.

Not only do I have to make the jars, go on my Jar Walk, document the placing of the jars with photographs, I also have to edit and upload the photos and write the daily blog post.

Then there’s all the hidden work: ordering materials; testing out ideas that don’t work; updating the jar databases; revisting jars to see if they’re still there; blogging about found and missing jars; answering emails and comments about the project.

It’s a bit relentless, to be honest. Fortunately I mostly enjoy it.

Jar 96 in situ
Philip: How do the pieces that you put inside the jars relate to your previously exhibited work?

Kirsty: Some relate very strongly – I’ve been consciously making ‘mini versions’ of some of my larger sculptures with the underlying idea that I’m having a year-long retrospective in jars. Several people have said that they appreciate being introduced to my back catalogue in this way. Certainly you could look at the jar project and get a very accurate feel for my work.

From my point of view, the project has a certain ‘decluttering’ quality to it. For example, I’m getting rid of a lot of old drawings and having a chance to use up lots of my art supplies. It’s also a way for me to explore all those niggly little ideas that didn’t seem big or important enough to justify a large, time-consuming sculpture. It feels as though I’m clearing space for new work to take root and I sense that this project is going to be a pivotal point in my art.

Jar 95: wire and red sand
There are a lot of new ideas in the project as well. Because the jars are small and happen on a daily basis, they’re a license for me to be playful and inventive. And undoubtedly some of the newer ideas that are coming up in the jars are ones that I will develop more fully in the future.

Philip: What was a) the most negative and b) the most positive response you’ve had so far?

Kirsty: The vast majority of people have been overwhelmingly positive. I love my Jar Fans, they’re wildly enthusiastic about the project and keep me going on the days when it’s a real struggle.

I think the most positive reaction has come from Mark, The Intrepid Jar Hunter. He’s a Bristol guy who found one of the earliest jars by accident and then started actively and somewhat obsessively hunting for them. It’s become a hobby for him. He’s found 21 jars to date and his passion for the project is obvious in the detailed, entertaining and insightful jar forms he submits. My international Jar Fans particularly adore him because he gives them a window into what finding a jar is like – they can’t get out to find jars themselves so they tend to live vicariously through Mark.

Amazingly I’ve only had two openly negative reactions so far and one of those later apologised and retracted what he’d said. So the most negative reaction was when someone raged at me about what I was doing. He just hated it, thought it was litter and that I was interfering with people’s appreciation of nature. It was clear that I’d triggered some kind of knee-jerk reaction because he hadn’t even realised that the vast majority of the jars are released in urban areas. He was so aggressive about it that I deleted his comment from the site: I don’t mind disagreement and being challenged about my ideas but I won’t stand for trollish behaviour and name-calling.

Philip: Quite right too! What were your expectations about the project before you started it, and have they changed in any way?

Kirsty: Well, it’s definitely been far more work than I anticipated!

I honestly thought I could continue several other projects and even start some new ones whilst doing the jars but that hasn’t been the case at all. I didn’t realise how epic and all-consuming it was going to be and I’ve had to massively readjust my plans for the year.

Jar 95, close-up.
I didn’t have much of a run up to the project. I only decided I was going to do it in December of last year so I didn’t have time to form too many expectations. But the project constantly throws up challenges and surprises for me; it’s partly what keeps it interesting for me.

The Jar Walks themselves have been a delightful revelation. Even on days when I can’t walk very far because of poor health - I’ve been diagnosed with ME/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and have a dodgy immune system – it feels so good to get out and walk. I’ve learnt so much about my local area and I feel connected to it in a way I didn’t before: I have a much more cohesive internal map of it now.

One of my biggest surprises was how quickly it took off. I was expecting to have a month or two where no one paid very much attention but that didn’t happen. I’ve had decent visitor numbers right from the start and I’ve not done much promotion, so it’s real word-of-mouth stuff.

Another surprise has been how Jar Finders engage with the project. For example, some people decided to replace the jars back outside in new spots. It hadn’t occurred to me that people might do that but I think it’s wonderful. People have really thrown themselves into the spirit of the project and that’s been so exciting, it feels as though the whole thing has a momentum and a meaning that’s far beyond me.

Follow the project at 365 Jars.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader


  1. Yay, Kirsty! I love seeing you pop up in interviews and blog posts around the web. It's wonderful how the jar project has taken off. I'm really looking forward to the day when one of them makes the journey to foreign lands!

  2. LaVonne,

    In addition to the obvious artistic merit of the project, one of the things that attracted me is that I know the area that Kirsty works in, a little. My brother lived in Bristol for a while, and in fact we went for a meal in a restaurant in Clifton for my 40th birthday a few years ago. In fact a colleague of mine was teaching at nearby Bath Spa last month, and I was tempted to ask him to go and hunt down a jar for me!

  3. Hi LaVonne, fancy seeing you here :-) One jar has already wound up in France but I'm looking forward to the day when I get to place some abroad (I don't think Scotland really counts!)

  4. Kirsty: Have you thought about Chicago? Or even 365 Jar international franchisees?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader