Skip to main content

On documentary film

Film is much on my mind at the moment. I'm currently halfway through a semester of co-teaching a class called Story in Fiction and Film International, which concentrates on the process of creating story as it emerges in fiction (such as Murukami, Allende, Kincaid, and other non-white or non-American writers) and films from around the world.

Then there's the recent interview I posted with Bruce Sheridan, chair of the Film and Video department at Columbia College Chicago. (By the way, for those who don't know this, the F & V program is the largest in the USA for interdisciplinary learning in film, and certainly one of the top two or three programs in the country by any standard you want to compare it to).

The teaching, and thinking about what Bruce said about language in relation to film, made me wonder why it is that the best films that I've seen recently have been documentaries, or non-fiction narratives in one form or another. "The Rape of Europa", about the industrial-scale looting of art by the Nazis in WWII, or "Which Way Home", about a group of migrant children travelling to the USA, are two that spring to my mind from films I've seen recently.



Or there's Bruce's film about Frank Sargeson, "Perfectly Frank", or Ken Burns' films about the Civil War and the history of Jazz. What is it that I find more satisfying about those films, as narratives, compared to the stuff that Hollywood shovels our way at the moment?



I think it's largely to do with the different pace. The non-fiction filmmaker doesn't feel the need to change shot every ten seconds, or even more quickly than that. Yes, there are the visual cliches of documentary -- the slow zoom out from the detail of a still photo, the contrasting pans back and forth across same -- but even those serve an important purpose: not just to animate the static frame, but to give the sense of attention lingering over something, taking the time to get meaning from it, to match the sense to voice-over and narrative.

There, in the end, is the key word: narrative. Story. So many films, even independent films, start well, but lose their nerve by the end, stray away from the implied (usually darker) resolution of the material in favour of something lighter, more hopeful. A good recent example would be "The Kids Are All Right", which to a large extent I enjoyed, but which seems to just peter out into a number of bland set pieces, presumably because the film-maker decided that she could lose her audience if she didn't corral the story back into the pen of domestic comedy.

Non-fiction film, documentary, call it what you will, can present its view of its subject, no doubt partial, never entirely the whole truth, but inits own time, and according to its own narrative pace. Perhaps I'm comparing apples and oranges here, but frankly I only seem to get a bitter taste when I bite into one, not the other.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post

Crikey!

It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Brancusi in Plastic

Artist Mary Ellen Croteau is showing these columns made from recycled plastic cartons and lids in the window of the Columbia College bookstore on Michigan Avenue. They are a playful homage to Brancusi's "Endless Columns", with a serious environmental message for our times:

Mary Ellen also runs a wonderful experimental art gallery in a window space in west Chicago, called Art on Armitage. I will be exhibiting a mixed media piece there during August 2012.