Skip to main content

On a print by Rirkrit Tiravanija

 I linked to this via Twitter yesterday, but I felt compelled to write a blog post about it. It's a print by Rirkrit Tiravanija, which is three feet high and eighty-four feet wide (yes, you read that correctly):

'Art in America' has kindly allowed the world to embed a video slideshow of the thing, as above.

The materials are inkjet prints, offset lithography, chine colle, and silkscreen, and it was produced in an edition of 40. Rirkrit has made an international reputation for his conceptual performances in which, among other things, he just cooked a load of food for people who turned up to a gallery on opening night. This colossal print is basically a kind of visual diary of his globe-trotting life, as he moves from country to country and project to project. Of course, he didn't produce the print all by himself: he had dozens of helpers, from master printmakers to student volunteers. But the result is a rich and incredibly beautiful mixture of marks, signs, shapes, and colours.

It's worth following a link to the article, too, to read about the production process for this print, and about Rirkrit's art in general (link here).

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader


Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader