Skip to main content

Some Non-Toxic Printmaking Results

I've been experimenting with non-toxic printmaking for a few years, and have even started teaching printmaking classes in the summer using these principles. What does "non-toxic" mean? It means that you try to replace all the chemicals used in the traditional printmaking processes -- many of which are now known to damage your health, as well as causing damage to the environment -- with agents that are safe to the user and can disperse harmlessly in the local water supply.

As I've converted my own processes, I've discovered that nothing is really completely non-toxic. There always seems to be a residual pollution, but compared to the acids and tars that were formerly used, the difference is huge. In terms of what the new materials can give you in terms of mark-making, I have also found that certain things are easier to replace than others. The Akua range of soy-based printmaking inks, for example: I found it a little difficult at first to judge the correct amount of ink to use for relief blocks and etching plates, but I soon got used to them. I still use oil-based inks for the paper-litho transfer technique, but I always use vegetable oil to clean up now, instead of the solvents and spirits I used in the past.

"Coal", paper-litho transfers, accordion binding

But for several years, I have tried to follow the non-toxic path to reproduce the etching techniques that are still my favourite form of printmaking -- such as hard ground etching, soft ground etching, and aquatint. The old grounds were produced with a lung-choking chemical mixture of tar-based resist, and rosin dust that is a known carcinogen. In an attempt to reduce the use of chemicals even further, I have been experimenting with ways of using carborundum and acrylic resist to make collagraphs that reproduce the appearance of an aquatint and hard-ground etching. I have had very little success, but last week I finally made a few prints that come close:

The lighter areas are in fact a dried layer of Lascaux acrylic resist, poured onto 5" x 7" aluminium plates (the thin, cheap variety that you can get from hardware stores for about $20 per 100). I then drew lines into the surface, which when I inked them up caught the ink like a hard-ground drawing. The thicker, darker areas are produced by pouring a mixture of resist and carborundum onto the plate. When that dries, the combination of grit particles and the tiny spaces in between each particle holds a lot of ink. You can vary the tones in those dark areas by adding more of the resist and making it more liquid.

For good measure, I added some chine colle when I printed these plates, though the contrast between the two kinds of paper wasn't strong enough to show. Another test that worked, though, was to clean one of the plates (using vegetable oil), then inking it up and printing it again, to see if it produced more than one print. I'm glad to say that it did. The ink, by the way, is Charbonell Etching Ink, Madder plus a little Black.

These were only test plates, but I had the imagery of coal, circles of coal, and mountains of coal in my mind that I have been playing with and returning to for the last few years, so I am of a mind to keep these and add them to the developing work.


  1. Phillip

    if you have questions on this kind of thing do feel free to email me. Its quite likely that I will have done something that is relevant. Good outcome I think. best wishes



Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post


It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Brancusi in Plastic

Artist Mary Ellen Croteau is showing these columns made from recycled plastic cartons and lids in the window of the Columbia College bookstore on Michigan Avenue. They are a playful homage to Brancusi's "Endless Columns", with a serious environmental message for our times:

Mary Ellen also runs a wonderful experimental art gallery in a window space in west Chicago, called Art on Armitage. I will be exhibiting a mixed media piece there during August 2012.