Skip to main content

On why I do this



I was having dinner with a friend who follows this blog regularly. He said he really enjoys reading it, but he felt that he had to ask: “What do you get out of it?” Specifically he meant, what reward do I get out of it in terms of my career?
It’s true that when I started this blog, at the end of 2009, I did so as part of an overhaul of how I marketed myself and my art. I had bought a book by art consultant Alyson Stanfield, ‘I’d Rather Be In the Studio’, and one of the many useful things she included in her book was a lot of convincing advice on why artists should start a blog, and use other social media such as Facebook and Twitter. So, after reading blogs online for years but somewhat disdaining the idea of the personal artist’s blog, I dipped a toe in the water, setting up this blog and vowing to write just a few posts a week.
After a couple of months, I decided that if I was going to do this, I might as well put some effort into it. So I started posting daily. I bought a book about how to write, update, and improve a blog. But I didn’t set it up as a pure marketing vehicle at all – in fact, most of the time I was talking about other art, and other artists, living and dead. I posted interviews that I conducted with other artists. I started the ‘Meditations’ series of weekly videos on art. When I had something of my own to talk about, such as the public art project that ran from July to November last year, I wrote posts about that. A few opportunities have come about as a result of some of the things on this blog, but generally what I get out of writing this blog is not counted in terms of direct career opportunities or financial rewards.
Writing a daily post is something that keeps my mind engaged with art, even when I’m not in the studio. It’s a way of making mental connections between the things and people that interest me, that may or may not lead to artistic opportunities for me. It’s a way of broadcasting my work to an audience, of course. It keeps me writing. It connects to the teaching that I am doing more of, year by year, as I talk about ideas that have come up in the classroom, or I share pictures of great student work. Ultimately, it would be nice if my blog led to a gallery or collector giving me a big pay-day. But until then, I hope to use it as a reasonably well-written and well-presented journal/diary, which just happens to be read by a hundred people or so each day.

 Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On my 300th blog post

Crikey!

It's my 300th blog post. And I seem to remember that in my 200th blog post I said that I would start quoting from John Ruskin's "Praeterita", after which this blog was named. Well, better late then never, so quotation number 2 is below.

First, though, some thoughts on this blog and blogging in general. I started Praeterita at the end of last year after reading a book by an art-marketing guru called Alyson Stansfield that recommended it as a means for artists to publicise their work better. But from the start I thought it would be more interesting to talk in a discursive way about my wider interest in art, and artists, and the history of art. After a desultory beginning where I only posted once a week, my blogging habit has now grown to the point where I am posting sometimes twice a day, and more than 45 times per month (helped enormously by the Blogger feature that lets you save blog posts with a post-dated timestamp, so that you can put posts in the bank to …

My worst open studio

Most open studios are notable for nothing really happening. You sit there waiting for people to come into your studio, eat all your nibbles and guzzle the free drink, and then leave after a cursory glance at your work. Usually, the worst thing that happens is that you get stuck in a boring conversation with a dull person,

But there was one time a few years ago when I got into one of these conversations, and quite quickly the person I was talking to started to make homophobic remarks about another artist in the building. After a few minutes, I decided I'd had enough and asked him to leave. He seemed genuinely surprised that I had any objection to what he was saying, which in retrospect makes me even angrier if he thought he had a sympathetic ear.

He asked me why, and I told him I didn't like people talking that way, and I said: "This conversation ended 30 seconds ago." So he left.

So, nothing dramatic like Jackson Pollock getting drunk in a fancy New York apartment a…

Van Gogh on Degas

From a letter dated July 31, 1888:
“Why do you say Degas can’t get it up properly? Degas lives like some petty lawyer and doesn’t like women, knowing very well that if he did like them and bedded them frequently, he’d go to seed and be in no position to paint any longer. The very reason why Degas’s painting is virile and impersonal is that he has resigned himself to being nothing more than a petty lawyer with a horror of kicking over the traces. He observes human animals who are stronger than him screwing and f—ing away and he paints them so well for the very reason that he isn’t all that keen on it himself.”
Subscribe to Praeterita in a reader